commit e531d4d1b9753e80b56a28805b01c014a1fe5d51
parent d52a5f2181f44ddb387e9d9a40523054a1f80bff
Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:40:10 -0400
Fix a completely wrong calculation in mach monotime_init_internal()
Bug 1: We were purporting to calculate milliseconds per tick, when we
*should* have been computing ticks per millisecond.
Bug 2: Instead of computing either one of those, we were _actually_
computing femtoseconds per tick.
These two bugs covered for one another on x86 hardware, where 1 tick
== 1 nanosecond. But on M1 OSX, 1 tick is about 41 nanoseconds,
causing surprising results.
Fixes bug 40684; bugfix on 0.3.3.1-alpha.
Diffstat:
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/changes/bug40684 b/changes/bug40684
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+ o Major bugfixes (OSX):
+ - Fix coarse-time computation on Apple platforms (like Mac M1) where
+ the Mach absolute time ticks do not correspond directly to
+ nanoseconds. Previously, we computed our shift value wrong, which
+ led us to give incorrect timing results.
+ Fixes bug 40684; bugfix on 0.3.3.1-alpha.
diff --git a/src/lib/time/compat_time.c b/src/lib/time/compat_time.c
@@ -253,11 +253,14 @@ monotime_init_internal(void)
tor_assert(mach_time_info.denom != 0);
{
- // approximate only.
- uint64_t ns_per_tick = mach_time_info.numer / mach_time_info.denom;
- uint64_t ms_per_tick = ns_per_tick * ONE_MILLION;
+ // We want to compute this, approximately:
+ // uint64_t ns_per_tick = mach_time_info.numer / mach_time_info.denom;
+ // uint64_t ticks_per_ms = ONE_MILLION / ns_per_tick;
+ // This calculation multiplies first, though, to improve accuracy.
+ uint64_t ticks_per_ms = (ONE_MILLION * mach_time_info.denom)
+ / mach_time_info.numer;
// requires that tor_log2(0) == 0.
- monotime_shift = tor_log2(ms_per_tick);
+ monotime_shift = tor_log2(ticks_per_ms);
}
{
// For converting ticks to milliseconds in a 32-bit-friendly way, we