commit 22a26a273e8dc8de663722f96487ca22d4980121
parent b6e60f26dd04fa4f2ae8020b4148147380b6d28b
Author: George Kadianakis <desnacked@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 14:01:49 +0300
Merge branch 'tor-github/pr/1909'
Diffstat:
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/changes/bug34303 b/changes/bug34303
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+ o Minor bugfixes (client performance):
+ - Resume being willing to use preemptively-built circuits when
+ UseEntryGuards is set to 0. We accidentally disabled this feature
+ with that config setting, leading to slower load times. Fixes bug
+ 34303; bugfix on 0.3.3.2-alpha.
diff --git a/src/core/or/circuitlist.c b/src/core/or/circuitlist.c
@@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@ circuit_find_to_cannibalize(uint8_t purpose_to_produce, extend_info_t *info,
}
/* Ignore any circuits for which we can't use the Guard. It is possible
- * that the Guard was removed from the samepled set after the circuit
+ * that the Guard was removed from the sampled set after the circuit
* was created so avoid using it. */
if (!entry_guard_could_succeed(circ->guard_state)) {
goto next;
diff --git a/src/feature/client/entrynodes.c b/src/feature/client/entrynodes.c
@@ -3454,10 +3454,16 @@ entry_guards_update_state(or_state_t *state)
entry_guards_dirty = 0;
}
-/** Return true iff the circuit's guard can succeed that is can be used. */
+/** Return true iff the circuit's guard can succeed, that is, can be used. */
int
entry_guard_could_succeed(const circuit_guard_state_t *guard_state)
{
+ if (get_options()->UseEntryGuards == 0) {
+ /* we're fine with this circuit's first hop, because we're not
+ * configured to use entry guards. */
+ return 1;
+ }
+
if (!guard_state) {
return 0;
}