tor-browser

commit 8e8f813e2a21a1251b3eb271bab9f4e6d01203b7
parent 07e6a965f3c69d044a61617658b1e131ef99a0e3
Author: Dan Baker <dbaker@mozilla.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Nov 2025 13:49:03 -0700

Bug 2000941 - Vendor libwebrtc from 5d3ec77016

Upstream commit: https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src/+/5d3ec7701675267805a8c75364ee41022d2d60c6
    Fix IsIceChar log message typo

    Credit to dkagedal :)

    Bug: None
    Change-Id: Ic0f7982b41b8d8aafde01967413d4051e9b88080
    Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/407804
    Reviewed-by: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
    Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
    Auto-Submit: Tony Herre <herre@google.com>
    Commit-Queue: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@webrtc.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#45561}

Diffstat:
M
third_party/libwebrtc/README.mozilla.last-vendor
 | 
4
++--
M
third_party/libwebrtc/p2p/base/transport_description.cc
 | 
2
+-

2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/third_party/libwebrtc/README.mozilla.last-vendor b/third_party/libwebrtc/README.mozilla.last-vendor
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 # ./mach python dom/media/webrtc/third_party_build/vendor-libwebrtc.py --from-local /Users/danielbaker/elm/.moz-fast-forward/moz-libwebrtc --commit mozpatches libwebrtc
-libwebrtc updated from /Users/danielbaker/elm/.moz-fast-forward/moz-libwebrtc commit mozpatches on 2025-11-20T20:46:23.715143+00:00.
+libwebrtc updated from /Users/danielbaker/elm/.moz-fast-forward/moz-libwebrtc commit mozpatches on 2025-11-20T20:48:49.407393+00:00.
 # base of lastest vendoring
-852512720d
+5d3ec77016
diff --git a/third_party/libwebrtc/p2p/base/transport_description.cc b/third_party/libwebrtc/p2p/base/transport_description.cc
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ bool IsIceChar(char c) {
   // permitted in order to allow external software to upgrade.
   if (c == '-' || c == '=' || c == '#' || c == '_') {
     RTC_LOG(LS_WARNING)
-        << "'-', '=', '#' and '-' are not valid ice-char and thus not "
+        << "'-', '=', '#' and '_' are not valid ice-char and thus not "
         << "permitted in ufrag or pwd. This is a protocol violation that "
         << "is permitted to allow upgrading but will be rejected in "
         << "the future. See https://crbug.com/1053756";