commit f25ffc43a78da13719d9646e5ccb308a791278b6
parent 3da8f4c7ee0d3d727bd8d160874ac55d661c3607
Author: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 09:50:59 +0800
vim-patch:dfcef89: runtime(vim): Distinguish Vim9 constructor definitions from the :new ex command (vim/vim#14050)
With the arrival of Vim9 classes, the syntax must allow for
_new_ constructors; multiple constructor definitions are
supported for a class, provided distinct suffix-names are
used. Currently, the defined constructors match either
vimCommand or vimFunctionError (for any newBar).
For example:
------------------------------------------------------------
vim9script
class Foo
def new()
enddef
def newBar()
enddef
endclass
------------------------------------------------------------
Since every constructor is required to bear a lower-cased
_new_ prefix name, it should suffice to distinguish them
from functions, and so there are no new highlight or syntax
groups introduced.
https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/dfcef890cbdd3ec26de040b2e26d77444dc46862
Co-authored-by: Aliaksei Budavei <32549825+zzzyxwvut@users.noreply.github.com>
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/runtime/syntax/vim.vim b/runtime/syntax/vim.vim
@@ -679,7 +679,8 @@ syn match vimUsrCmd '^\s*\zs\u\%(\w*\)\@>\%([(#[]\|\s\+\%([-+*/%]\=\|\.\.\)=\)\@
" Errors And Warnings: {{{2
" ====================
if !exists("g:vimsyn_noerror") && !exists("g:vimsyn_novimfunctionerror")
- syn match vimFunctionError "\s\zs[a-z0-9]\i\{-}\ze\s*(" contained contains=vimFuncKey,vimFuncBlank
+ " TODO: The new-prefix exception should only apply to constructor definitions.
+ syn match vimFunctionError "\s\zs\%(new\)\@![a-z0-9]\i\{-}\ze\s*(" contained contains=vimFuncKey,vimFuncBlank
syn match vimFunctionError "\s\zs\%(<[sS][iI][dD]>\|[sSgGbBwWtTlL]:\)\d\i\{-}\ze\s*(" contained contains=vimFuncKey,vimFuncBlank
syn match vimElseIfErr "\<else\s\+if\>"
syn match vimBufnrWarn /\<bufnr\s*(\s*["']\.['"]\s*)/