commit d539a952da2520bac7e0b4d4b28bf6ff53c39b7b
parent e4c4d672b581124da1205a008d44fd278a88d6af
Author: luukvbaal <luukvbaal@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 08:39:34 +0200
vim-patch:9.1.1385: inefficient loop for 'nosmoothscroll' scrolling (#33992)
Problem: Loop that ensures "w_skipcol" is zero with 'nosmoothscroll'
for (half)-page scrolling is inefficient.
Solution: Calculate the required "count" instead of looping until
"w_skipcol" is zero (Luuk van Baal).
https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/acf0ebe8a8f4dd389a8fe8cea52ff43bc8bfe1be
Diffstat:
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/nvim/move.c b/src/nvim/move.c
@@ -2428,11 +2428,16 @@ static bool scroll_with_sms(Direction dir, int count, int *curscount)
if (labs(curwin->w_topline - prev_topline) > (dir == BACKWARD)) {
fixdir = dir * -1;
}
- while (curwin->w_skipcol > 0
- && curwin->w_topline < curbuf->b_ml.ml_line_count) {
- scroll_redraw(fixdir == FORWARD, 1);
- *curscount += (fixdir == dir ? 1 : -1);
+
+ int width1 = curwin->w_view_width - win_col_off(curwin);
+ int width2 = width1 + win_col_off2(curwin);
+ count = 1 + (curwin->w_skipcol - width1) / width2;
+ if (fixdir == FORWARD) {
+ count = 2 + (linetabsize_eol(curwin, curwin->w_topline)
+ - curwin->w_skipcol - width1) / width2;
}
+ scroll_redraw(fixdir == FORWARD, count);
+ *curscount += count * (fixdir == dir ? 1 : -1);
}
curwin->w_p_sms = prev_sms;
diff --git a/test/old/testdir/test_normal.vim b/test/old/testdir/test_normal.vim
@@ -4355,4 +4355,13 @@ func Test_scroll_longline_scrolloff()
bwipe!
endfunc
+" Benchmark test for Ctrl-F with 'nosmoothscroll'
+func Test_scroll_longline_benchmark()
+ call setline(1, ['foo'->repeat(20000)] + [''])
+ let start = reltime()
+ exe "normal! \<C-F>"
+ call assert_inrange(0, 0.1, reltimefloat(reltime(start)))
+ bwipe!
+endfunc
+
" vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab nofoldenable